Online Community of Zenith Builders and Flyers
There are several solutions to prevent a fuel system from sucking air from a fuel tank while in a steep turn when the fuel level is low. This has been a hot debate on other forums.
I am curious to hear from folks who are actually flying their planes on which design you use to address this risk.
1) Header tanks?
2) Check valves?
3) Limit fuel selector valve to only use R or L tank but not both?
4) None, I use "both" on my selector valve and do not have a header tank and have not had any issues.
Could you you please comment which model you are flying and what engine, and if it is F.I. or carburated and if you have fuel return lines.
Thank you !!!!!
Charlie
Tags:
Thanks Ken. I may start with moving back to the simple on off setup.
Fortunately, there was minimal damage to the gear. However, if I hadn't cleared the trees on final, it would have been a very different story.
Ryan,
The question in my mind is not why have a both selection, but rather why even have a right or left option. Tank selection is important if you fly a fuel injected engine like I have, otherwise you have to play some rather remote what if games to justify right or left. Just ask your friends who fly 172s when they last turned their fuel selector from the both position to right or left was. Never?
I looked very hard at installing a header tank in my Cruzer but instead decided on investigating installing an audio low fuel alarm on my Dynon. After your posting I see the need to also test my usable fuel levels more closely.
Ralph
Thanks Ralph, I agree. I am just trying to find someone who has a reason for R/L. I can't think of one, unless there is a venting issue in one of the tanks, or possible contamination in one of the tanks (water), you have the option to troubleshoot and remedy the problem safely in flight.
You are right, the only time I use R/L in a 172 is when it is parked to prevent cross feeding.
To partially answer the question about "why not have a both position on the fuel selector" I will point out that the Federal aircraft rules require that both fuel tanks have the vent system interconnected if there is a Both setting on the fuel selector. Most Zenith planes (assuming built to plans) do not have provisions for a joined fuel vent system, they just use various vent arrangements for the individual tanks. The Cessna 172 mentioned earlier does have an interconnected vent system and one little vent fitting sticking out of the left wing that vents both tanks. Most other light aircraft (Cherokees, Grummans, etc) have individual vents for each tank. Those planes have a Left/Right/Off fuel selector. The Cessna has a Left/Right/Both/Off fuel selector.
We are building experimental planes and could use a both setting with individually vented tanks but I would advise against it. The Federal requirement is there for a reason (actually, several reasons).
Please don't leave us guessing! What are the several reasons not to use an ON/OFF valve (instead of Left/Right/Off) with individually vented tanks? ON/OFF is, after all, what Zenith plans specify.
Because a clogged vent may render one tanks fuel inaccessible. The C172S (injected) manual states that it has three vents; the ram air one behind the left strut which connects to both tanks as well as vented fuel caps.
A little late in the conversation, but here is a schematic of our fuel system with Viking 130 engine
Jim, it's very possible I misunderstood what you are saying, but I doubt there’s any aircraft out there that can stop the fuel flow as rapidly as we can. For us, it’s a simple matter of turning off a toggle switch on the instrument panel in front of the pilot for one or both fuel pumps. Not a drop of fuel can pass these fuel pumps when there are turned off. Further, because our header tank w/integral fuel pumps are in the aft fuselage, we have no fuel fittings which could leak anywhere within the cabin.
Moreover, while much in the FAR is useful information, it is not a mandate for Experimental Aircraft. Section 23.1(a) of the FAR, under Applicability, states “This part prescribes airworthiness standards for the issue of type certificates, and changes to those certificates, for airplanes in the normal, utility, acrobatic, and commuter categories.” So, unless I missed something, none of Section 23 applies.
Sorry to not reply promptly, been out of town briefly. You guys got it all right - the requirement to interconnect fuel tank "airspaces" is what I was calling interconnected fuel vents. You found the correct reference. And it is also correct that the rule does not apply to Experimental aircraft. However, if it's good enough for the certified types, it's good enough for me. However, folks are right to say we can set up the fuel system however we want as long as it passes the various function and flow tests once built. And yes, most of the high wing Cessnas do have interconnected tank vent plumbing to go with the "Both" setting on the fuel selector.
Classified listing for buying or selling your Zenith building or flying related stuff...
Custom Instrument Panels
for your Zenith:
Custom instrument panels are now available directly from Zenith Aircraft Company exclusively for Zenith builders and owners. Pre-cut panel, Dynon and Garmin avionics, and more.
Zenith Homecoming Tee:
Flying On Your Own Wings:
A Complete Guide to Understanding Light Airplane Design, by Chris Heintz
Pro Builder Assistance:
Transition training:
Aircraft Spruce & Specialty for all your building and pilot supplies!
How to videos from HomebuiltHELP.com
Developed specifically for Zenith builders (by a builder) these videos on DVD are a great help in building your own kit plane by providing practical hands-on construction information. Visit HomebuiltHelp.com for the latest DVD titles.
© 2024 Created by Zenith.Aero. Powered by
Exlusive online community for active builders and pilots of Zenith Aircraft kits (Chris Heintz / Zenair light airplane designs).